Judge Lets Suit Proceed Over North Carolina Confining Foster Children in Psychiatric Facilities

A federal judge let a class action proceed that accuses North Carolina of unnecessarily confining foster children with disabilities in psychiatric facilities.
The North Carolina State Capitol in Raleigh
Photo: Jim Bowen from Fort Worth, US / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

From the archive: This story covers events from March 2024. FAN is adding past cases to its public record; the latest available update is under “Where it stands now.”

Raleigh, North Carolina — A federal judge refused on March 29, 2024, to dismiss a class action accusing North Carolina of unnecessarily confining foster children with disabilities in locked psychiatric residential treatment facilities, writing that the treatment alleged was “at best, inadequate, and, at worst, highly abusive.”

U.S. District Judge William L. Osteen Jr. of the Middle District of North Carolina rejected every argument the state Department of Health and Human Services raised for throwing the case out.

What the lawsuit alleges

The suit was filed Dec. 6, 2022, by Disability Rights North Carolina, the North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and Children’s Rights on behalf of foster youth with mental or behavioral health disabilities. It claims the state violates the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act by segregating children in institutions when they could be served in their communities. The named child plaintiffs appear under pseudonyms.

The FAN Podcast · New episodes every Tuesday & Friday

The cases they buried, read out loud.

New
Episode 19 · Nov 13 · 12 min

The Civil Death Penalty: How the State Terminates Parental Rights, and How Parents Fight Back

About 1 in 100 American children will see a parent's rights terminated by age 18, and on one day in 2025, 46,308 children whose parents' rights were already cut off were still waiting in…

Episode 19 · Nov 13, 2026 · 12:09
0:0012:09

According to The News & Observer, more than 500 children were held in the facilities as of November 2021, and Disability Rights North Carolina found that more than half of the children sent to them were in foster care. Carolina Journal reported that the five named plaintiffs were among 572 children placed in the facilities during the 2020-21 budget year.

The suit’s allegations, as reported by The News & Observer, include:

  • Children at one facility in Marshville were confined to their bedrooms for up to 30 days.
  • A child reported that a therapist touched him sexually; the therapist was suspended.
  • A 15-year-old from Craven County was airlifted to a trauma center after an assault at a facility in Kinston.
  • A 16-year-old in Mecklenburg County DSS custody was held at a facility in Rock Hill, South Carolina, for months and given at least 12 pills a day.

The ruling

The state argued that it lacked community services, that the plaintiffs lacked standing and that state court hearings had already sent the children to the facilities. Osteen found the children had standing and had adequately pleaded that community placement was appropriate, that they wanted community services and that the placements could reasonably be provided. He also held that the earlier state court placement decisions did not bar the claims. In April 2023, the U.S. Attorney’s Office had filed a statement of interest supporting the plaintiffs’ disability claims.

The state’s lawyers described its reforms as a long-term undertaking.

a long-term, herculean effort

Lawyers for DHHS Secretary Kody Kinsley, as quoted by Carolina Journal

Where the system failed

Children taken into state custody for their protection were, by the lawsuit’s account, placed in locked settings that a federal judge described as potentially abusive, often far from family and sometimes out of state.

Where it stands now

In June 2024, Carolina Journal reported that both sides had entered settlement talks and jointly asked for a 60-day stay of proceedings through July 15, 2024, with the option to extend it. Class certification had not been decided. FAN found no public report of a settlement, court approval or trial after June 2024; Disability Rights North Carolina’s case page lists no later court action, and the public docket summary reviewed by FAN ends in April 2024.

When the state takes custody of a child, it decides where that child sleeps. A system that confines children in institutions because it has not arranged anything else is making a choice, and families deserve to know who answers for it. FAN covers how children move through care in its overview of foster care system problems.

Key facts

  • Case: B. v. Kinsley, No. 1:22-cv-01046, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
  • Filed Dec. 6, 2022, by Disability Rights North Carolina, the NC NAACP and Children’s Rights
  • Claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
  • March 29, 2024: Judge William L. Osteen Jr. denied the state’s motion to dismiss
  • 572 children were placed in the facilities in the 2020-21 budget year, Carolina Journal reported
  • June 2024: settlement talks and a joint stay through July 15, 2024; no public resolution found since

Sources

What you can do

Don't just read it. Act on it.

Lawmakers fund and oversee this system. Tell North Carolina lawmakers what happened here.

Open in my email

Get an email when this case has a new development: charges, court dates, verdicts, settlements. Only about this case; unsubscribe anytime.

Lived through something like this? Your case could be the next one we document.

Read next

This story exists because families spoke up.

Father’s Advocacy Network is a nonprofit newsroom. We don’t take money from the agencies we cover. Help us keep exposing what happens behind closed doors.

About Father’s Advocacy Network. We investigate failures inside CPS, foster care, adoption and family court — and stand with parents fighting to bring their children home. Have a correction or a tip? Contact our newsroom.

Most Read

Is this happening to your family?

Tell us your story — confidentially. Every case we cover starts with a parent speaking up.

Join the conversation

Have something to add? Create a free account or log in to comment. Accounts keep the discussion real and free of bots.

Create free accountLog in

Scroll to Top