Wyoming Boys’ School Isolation Trial Opens in Federal Court; First of Six Ex-Residents’ Suits

The first of six lawsuits by former Wyoming Boys' School residents went to a federal jury in Casper on Nov. 9, with isolation and a riot-shield takedown at issue.
Townsend Justice Center in Casper, Wyoming
Photo: Chevsapher / Wikimedia Commons, CC0

Casper, Wyoming — A federal jury began hearing the first of six lawsuits by former residents of the Wyoming Boys’ School on Monday, Nov. 9, more than two years after the cases were filed. The trial in U.S. District Court in Casper centers on claims that staff at the state-run facility near Worland used isolation as punishment and used excessive force against a teenager in their custody.

What the jury will decide

The plaintiff, now an adult, spent two stays of about 11 months each at the school between the ages of 15 and 17, according to WyoFile and Cowboy State Daily. He alleges school staff violated his 14th Amendment rights through isolation, excessive force and denial of due process. FAN does not name people who were children when the alleged abuse occurred.

The Wyoming Boys’ School is a 38-acre residential facility overseen by the Wyoming Department of Family Services. It holds boys ages 12 to 21 who have been adjudicated delinquent. The defendants include the school, the Department of Family Services and individual staff members, including Thad Shaffer and Dale Weber, WyoFile and Cowboy State Daily reported.

Jury selection took the first morning. WyoFile reported that eight jurors were seated and that the trial is expected to last five to seven days. U.S. District Judge Scott Skavdahl is presiding.

The record so far

In an October ruling, Skavdahl allowed some, but not all, of the plaintiff’s claims to go to a jury. He wrote that staff may have placed the teen in isolation for predetermined periods, and that such stays could have become punishment rather than a response to a safety threat. Cowboy State Daily reported that the judge called predetermined isolation terms the most compelling evidence on that point.

The FAN Podcast · New episodes every Tuesday & Friday

The cases they buried, read out loud.

New
Episode 18 · Nov 10 · 11 min

The Autopsy Report That Didn’t Exist: Texas CPS Took a Grieving Family’s Toddler

Less than 72 hours after a Tarrant County couple's two-month-old son died, Texas CPS and its contractor filed to take their healthy two-year-old daughter. A new federal lawsuit says the sworn affidavit behind that…

Episode 18 · Nov 10, 2026 · 10:40
0:0010:40

Among the claims headed to trial is a Nov. 23, 2021, incident in which Shaffer allegedly pushed the teen against a wall with a riot shield before staff took him to the floor. Cowboy State Daily reported that the judge found the video showed the teen complying, not actively resisting. A procedural due process claim against Weber, over isolation imposed without notice or a hearing, also survived.

Last month the judge refused a defense request to bar the phrase “solitary confinement” from the trial, while warning he would watch for language meant to inflame the jury. He also ordered the defense to bring physical items into court, including a spit mask, mechanical restraints, riot gear, a mattress and magnets used in detention rooms.

Opening statements

Plaintiff’s attorney Ciara Boerman told jurors that staff locked the teen away instead of helping him manage his emotions, WyoFile reported. The defense has argued in court filings that every instance of what the plaintiff calls isolation served a legitimate purpose, and staff who placed him in isolation are claiming qualified immunity.

A difficult child, but still a child.

Ciara Boerman, plaintiff’s attorney, as reported by WyoFile

Defense attorney Catherine Young told jurors the school’s staff had a positive relationship with the teen and that his mental health struggles began before he arrived. She said the evidence would show the conditions were not solitary confinement.

About difficult decisions made in difficult circumstances.

Catherine Young, defense attorney, describing the case, as reported by WyoFile

Where the system failed

The Boys’ School has denied using solitary confinement as punishment. The school does not describe its practices as isolation, a point the judge noted in his ruling. That gap between what a facility calls a practice and what a child experiences is the question now before the jury. Skavdahl has already said the answer turns on facts, not on labels.

A second former resident’s case is set for trial Nov. 30. Last week the judge allowed some of that resident’s isolation claims to proceed against two staff members, Elsa Olson and John Schwalbe, even though the boy was never formally placed on detention status, according to WyoFile.

What’s next

The plaintiff was expected to testify Tuesday, Nov. 10. Four more cases by former residents remain after the November trials.

When the state takes custody of a child, it takes on the duty to treat that child better than the home it removed him from. A facility that can lock a teenager in a room for set terms, cover the window and call it something other than isolation operates without the due process any adult would demand. Families and advocates tracking foster care system problems should watch how this jury weighs the state’s own video.

Key facts

  • Trial opened Nov. 9, 2026, in U.S. District Court in Casper before Judge Scott Skavdahl.
  • It is the first of six suits by former residents filed in 2024.
  • The school, near Worland, is overseen by the Wyoming Department of Family Services and holds boys ages 12 to 21.
  • Claims include isolation as punishment, a 2021 riot-shield takedown and isolation without notice or a hearing.
  • The judge refused to bar the phrase “solitary confinement” and ordered restraints, riot gear and detention-room magnets brought to court.
  • A second former resident’s trial is set for Nov. 30.

Sources

What you can do

Don't just read it. Act on it.

Lawmakers fund and oversee this system. Tell Wyoming lawmakers what happened here.

Open in my email

Get an email when this case has a new development: charges, court dates, verdicts, settlements. Only about this case; unsubscribe anytime.

Lived through something like this? Your case could be the next one we document.

Read next

This story exists because families spoke up.

Father’s Advocacy Network is a nonprofit newsroom. We don’t take money from the agencies we cover. Help us keep exposing what happens behind closed doors.

About Father’s Advocacy Network. We investigate failures inside CPS, foster care, adoption and family court — and stand with parents fighting to bring their children home. Have a correction or a tip? Contact our newsroom.

Most Read

Is this happening to your family?

Tell us your story — confidentially. Every case we cover starts with a parent speaking up.

Join the conversation

Have something to add? Create a free account or log in to comment. Accounts keep the discussion real and free of bots.

Create free accountLog in

Scroll to Top