Middletown, Conn. — A Connecticut judge ruled on Oct. 16 that the state Department of Children and Families is not liable for the 2015 death of a 7-month-old boy whose father threw him from the Arrigoni Bridge into the Connecticut River, ending a $15 million lawsuit that argued the agency had been warned the father was threatening the child and his mother.
The decision, issued after a bench trial held in Waterbury, found the family had not shown DCF was negligent or that its actions caused the boy’s death, NBC Connecticut reported. Law360 reported the judge ruled the estate did not prove the death was caused by DCF workers who failed to remove the child from his father.
What the mother says she told DCF
The boy’s mother, Adrianne Oyola, sued the state claiming DCF knew the father, Tony Moreno, had threatened their lives and failed to act. Moreno is serving a 70-year prison sentence for murdering his son and testified in the civil case.
According to testimony reported by WFSB when the trial opened in May, DCF caseworker Kimberly Natoli met with Oyola a few weeks before the death. Oyola told her Moreno was angry and controlling, that he pushed, poked and insulted her, and that he had threatened to make her and the baby “disappear.” She also said he threatened to take the baby and kill himself if she left. A judge had denied Oyola an additional restraining order against Moreno.
The lawsuit also alleged that DCF workers did not attend a hearing on extending a restraining order against the father and did not follow up after the order expired, NBC Connecticut reported in June.
It’s not only a direct threat against the child, it indicates a willingness and a desire to punish the other parent.
Dr. Nicol Stolar Peterson, child protection expert witness, as reported by WFSB
How the state defended DCF
Natoli testified that the baby appeared well cared for, with food, appropriate bedding and a mother who looked after him. DCF’s attorneys argued that, based on what the agency knew at the time, removing the child was not warranted, and that a 96-hour hold typically requires more severe threats or violence, such as strangulation or use of a weapon. The state has said DCF followed protocol and that its investigation was still open when the boy died.
The family’s attorney, Keith McCabe, told the court in closing arguments that “DCF had enough information available to it that they could have acted.” Coverage of the ruling did not include a statement from DCF.
A long road to court
Families in Connecticut generally cannot sue the state without permission. A judge earlier allowed this case to proceed, finding DCF “may be held liable for failing to protect the child despite repeated warnings,” The Day reported. The ruling came more than 11 years after the boy’s death.
The case is one of several testing DCF’s accountability. NBC Connecticut has reported that the state paid $12 million in a 2023 case involving a child a caseworker repeatedly failed to see during home visits, $1.6 million over the 2017 starvation death of a 17-year-old whose case DCF had closed weeks earlier, and $2 million over a toddler who died in foster care in 2016. DCF Commissioner Susan Hamilton has said the agency reviews such tragedies through a “continuous quality improvement framework rather than a reactionary one.”
Why it matters
Child welfare agencies hold enormous power to enter homes and separate families, often on thin evidence. Yet when an agency is given specific, documented warnings and does not act, courts frequently find no one responsible. That gap, where the system can be wrong in either direction without consequence, is a central accountability problem. Parents who believe a caseworker ignored or mishandled their concerns can learn how to document it in FAN’s guide to filing a CPS complaint.
Key facts
- Ruling issued Oct. 16, 2026, after a bench trial in Waterbury.
- The court found the family did not prove DCF was negligent or caused the death.
- The 7-month-old was thrown from the Arrigoni Bridge in Middletown in July 2015.
- Father Tony Moreno is serving 70 years for the murder.
- Mother Adrianne Oyola sought $15 million, alleging DCF ignored threats she reported.
- DCF argued removal was not warranted based on what it knew at the time.
Sources
- NBC Connecticut — Judge rules in favor of DCF in lawsuit over death of baby thrown from Middletown bridge (2026-10-16)
- Law360 — Conn. Agency Prevails Against Estate’s $20M Infant Death Suit (2026-10-16)
- WFSB — Trial begins over death of baby thrown from Arrigoni Bridge (2026-05-05)
- The Day — Mother of baby thrown off Arrigoni Bridge in Middletown can sue Connecticut DCF, judge rules
- NBC Connecticut — Lawsuits, settlements raise questions about DCF accountability in Connecticut (2026-06-03)
Don't just read it. Act on it.
Lawmakers fund and oversee this system. Tell Connecticut lawmakers what happened here.
Get an email when this case has a new development: charges, court dates, verdicts, settlements. Only about this case; unsubscribe anytime.
Lived through something like this? Your case could be the next one we document.
30 DEATHSUp nextRhode Island Child Advocate Reviews 30 Deaths, Finds DCYF Screened Out Warning CallsA Rhode Island Child Advocate panel reviewed 30 child deaths and 11 near-deaths and found DCYF screened out some hotline calls that should have been investigated.
Oct 22, 2026
LAWSUITFederal lawsuit says Nebraska YRTC-Kearney staff abused teen, punished him for reporting itOct 21, 2026
Texas Asks Judge to End Foster Care Oversight While Admitting 7 Court Orders UnmetOct 21, 2026
ABUSE IN CARENewsom Signs SB 577, Raising Bar for Older Abuse Survivors Suing California CountiesOct 20, 2026

















