Atlanta, Ga. — Georgia’s Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS) filed paperwork saying a Fulton County mother’s children were not in immediate danger, had a judge reject its emergency request, then came back two days later and took the kids into foster care anyway, without ever giving the mother a hearing first. Last month, the Supreme Court of Georgia heard her challenge, and according to the Georgia Recorder, several justices sounded skeptical of the agency’s position.
The case, In the Interest of D.B., asks a question that reaches every family in Georgia: when can DFCS take children from a parent before that parent has any chance to be heard?
What happened to Dayshundra Wilson’s family
Dayshundra Wilson lived in Atlanta with her five children. On June 8, 2024, her 13-year-old son was taken to the hospital with a self-inflicted gunshot wound. He died three days later, and the medical examiner ruled the death a suicide, the Georgia Recorder reported.
About a month later, on July 9, 2024, DFCS went to juvenile court claiming two of Wilson’s minor children were “dependent” and asking for an emergency order to take them into protective custody. The agency’s own paperwork, according to the Recorder, said the children were not in immediate danger and that shelter care was unnecessary. The judge refused to sign the order, citing the lack of immediate danger and Wilson’s cooperation with caseworkers.
Two days later, on July 11, DFCS filed a second emergency request. This one stressed the teen’s suicide and claimed Wilson knew about an unsecured weapon in the home. The same judge approved it, and the children were placed in foster care.
What the hearing revealed
At a July 15, 2024 hearing, the agency’s case fell apart, according to the Recorder’s account of the record:
- A caseworker testified the gun did not belong to Wilson and that no other guns were found.
- A sibling said he knew about the gun, had kept it secret, and believed it came from a local youth Wilson had warned him to avoid.
- No evidence showed Wilson knew about the gun, and she was never charged in connection with the shooting.
- The caseworker testified there was no evidence of abuse or neglect before or after the death, and that the children wanted to be with their mother.
- The caseworker also testified that “upper leadership” at the agency wanted the children removed.
The juvenile court ordered the children returned immediately and criticized DFCS for adding to their trauma by removing them after their brother’s death. But the same court rejected Wilson’s constitutional challenge, finding the agency had followed proper procedure, and the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed. According to the ACLU, the appellate court held the state can remove children before a parent is heard in “exceptional” circumstances, and read that word to mean merely “unusual.”
The Georgia Supreme Court arguments
Wilson’s attorney, Emma Brown-Bernstein, argued that removing children without a hearing, while conceding there is no immediate danger, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The state may act first and ask questions later only in a true emergency, she argued, and this was not one.
Deputy Solicitor General Sven Henningson argued for the state that DFCS followed Georgia’s juvenile code, promptly scheduled a hearing, and that the case is moot because Wilson got her children back. He pointed to the child’s death in the home and conflicting information about the weapon as the exceptional circumstances.
Justice Charlie Bethel pressed the state on whether it can remove children without a parent present when it concedes there is no emergency, the Recorder reported. Justice Verda Colvin noted that the removal came “particularly after a month had passed.”
require a genuine emergency before the State may remove a child without first hearing from their parent
ACLU and ACLU of Georgia, describing the standard their amicus brief asks the Georgia Supreme Court to adopt
Why this matters to every Georgia parent
Emergency removals are supposed to be for emergencies. Here, according to the record described by the Recorder, DFCS’s own first filing said there was none, a judge agreed, and the agency simply tried again. Testimony that “upper leadership” wanted the children out suggests the decision was driven from the top, not by facts in the home.
The ACLU warned in its filing that removals like this are often brief and appeals are slow, so the practice rarely gets reviewed by a higher court, and families with the fewest resources are hit hardest. The state’s mootness argument illustrates the trap: because Wilson won her children back, the state says there is nothing left to decide.
A ruling from the Supreme Court of Georgia requiring a genuine emergency before an ex parte removal would give every parent in the state a real protection, not just a hearing after the damage is done.
What parents can do
If DFCS seeks to remove your children, ask immediately whether the agency obtained a court order and on what grounds. Request copies of every petition and affidavit filed, including any the judge rejected. Get a lawyer before the 72-hour hearing if at all possible, and preserve evidence of your cooperation with caseworkers.
Key facts
- Case: In the Interest of D.B., et al., Supreme Court of Georgia; argued in September 2026, ruling pending.
- Parent: Dayshundra Wilson, Atlanta (Fulton County).
- Agency: Georgia Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS).
- Timeline: Son died June 2024; first emergency order rejected July 9, 2024; second approved July 11; children ordered home after July 15 hearing.
- Issue: Whether DFCS may remove children before a parent is heard without a genuine emergency.
- Support: ACLU and ACLU of Georgia filed an amicus brief backing the mother.
Sources
- Georgia Recorder — Justices sound skeptical of Georgia agency’s decision to remove children from their home (Sept. 25, 2026)
- Cobb County Courier (republished from Georgia Recorder) — Justices sound skeptical of Georgia agency’s decision to remove children from their home (Sept. 25, 2026)
- ACLU — In the Interest of D.B., et al. (case page) (updated Sept. 3, 2026)
- ACLU / ACLU of Georgia — Amicus brief, In the Interest of D.B. (Georgia Supreme Court) (Sept. 2, 2026)
Up next · GeorgiaFederal Judge Orders Georgia to Stop Billing Parents for Kids No Longer in Foster CareRead the story →Get an email when we report more on:
